NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 40 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 559
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 vs 1561
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 vs 4.278
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 1044
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 1044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570

• Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
• Around 70% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
• 900x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 212
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 100.391
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.464 vs 0.441
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 vs 8.146
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 vs 20.64
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 977
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1833
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 977
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1833
• 4.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 846 vs 192

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	623 559
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	212 218
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1946 1561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.705 4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.391 255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.441 0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.146 13.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.64 59.183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2716
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	192 846

Compare specifications (specs)