NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 192 vs 20
- 8x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 46 gflops
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 524
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 8.335
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 vs 817
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 1381
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 vs 817
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 1381
- Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 192 vs 152
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 3 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 46 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 vs 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 vs 1381 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 vs 152 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 212
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2143 vs 1946
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 6.705
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 154.696 vs 100.391
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.441
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.084 vs 8.146
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 1833
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 1833
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 vs 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 vs 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 vs 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 vs 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 vs 8.146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 3044 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | GK208B | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 3 September 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1421 |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 350 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 46 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 392 million |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo | ||
Quick Sync |