NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 versus Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 15.26 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s
- 9.6x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 20
- 8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 366.3 gflops versus 46 gflops
- Environ 5% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 20 Watt
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 versus 524
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 versus 8.335
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 versus 817
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 versus 1381
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 versus 817
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 versus 1381
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 192 versus 152
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 3 September 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops versus 46 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 20 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 versus 524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 versus 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 versus 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 versus 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 versus 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 1381 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 versus 152 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 versus 212
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2143 versus 1946
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 versus 6.705
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 154.696 versus 100.391
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 versus 0.441
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.084 versus 8.146
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 versus 1833
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 versus 1833
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 versus 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 versus 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 versus 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 versus 8.146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 versus 1833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 3044 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 | 152 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | GK208B | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 3 September 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1488 | 1421 |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 350 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | 46 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 20 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | 392 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo | ||
Quick Sync |