NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- 9.3x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 628 vs 116
- 6.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 31
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 497
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 688
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 497
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 688
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 12 October 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 30.5 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 628 vs 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 vs 31 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 vs 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 vs 688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 vs 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 500x more memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2438 vs 1947
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 vs 1947 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 628 | 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 31 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1947 | 2438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 688 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK208B | GT218 |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 12 October 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | $29.49 |
Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1661 |
Price now | $34.99 | $32.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | 6.81 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1402 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | 16 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | 105 °C |
Pipelines | 192 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | 2.731" (6.9 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 6.60" (16.8 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 8.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |