NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 7.9x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 591
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 54
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 4 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 192 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 591 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 54 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 387.1 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- 1100x more memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3108 vs 1494
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1833
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3108 vs 1494
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1833
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3108 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3108 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 591 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 54 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GK208B | G92B |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 4 March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1021 |
Price now | $34.99 | $114.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | 9.91 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1836 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | 128 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 387.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | 105 °C |
Pipelines | 192 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 47.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo | ||
SLI |