NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 640 MHz
• Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• Around 49% better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 40 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 526
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 vs 5.617
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 16.137
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 vs 899
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 1255
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 vs 899
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 1255

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600

• 1600x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 212
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2100 vs 1946
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 185.752 vs 100.391
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.526 vs 0.441
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.023 vs 8.146
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2037 vs 1833
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2037 vs 1833

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	623 526
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	212 232
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1946 2100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.705 5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.391 185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.441 0.526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.146 9.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.64 16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2037
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2037

Compare specifications (specs)