NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 29 September 2014 vs 8 October 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB or 1 GB
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1051 vs 631
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 208
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7525 vs 2224
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 4.418
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 304.279 vs 142.734
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 0.395
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 8.158
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 17.317
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 895
- 11.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 280
- 6.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 519
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 895
- 11.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 280
- 6.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 519
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops vs 306.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB or 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1051 vs 631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 vs 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7525 vs 2224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 vs 4.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 vs 142.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 vs 0.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 vs 8.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 vs 17.317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 vs 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 vs 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 519 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 | 1051 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | 283 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2224 | 7525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | 20.161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | 304.279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | 1.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | 30.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 | 96.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 | 2179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 280 | 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 519 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 | 2179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 280 | 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 519 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | AMD Radeon R7 250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK208B | Oland |
Launch date | 29 September 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | $89 |
Place in performance rating | 1590 | 1087 |
Price now | $54.99 | $78.34 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.44 | 27.62 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | 716.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s | 22.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 75 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | N / A |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB or 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |