NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1688
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 vs 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 vs 1688 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 830
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 253
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 2902
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 10.872
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 166.832
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.817
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 12.415
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 36.916
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3324
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3324
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 vs 830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 vs 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5331 vs 2902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 vs 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 vs 166.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 vs 0.817 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 vs 12.415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 vs 36.916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 902 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 274 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 5331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 13.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 290.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 1.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 21.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 60.326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GF108 | Oland |
| Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $69 |
| Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1236 |
| Price now | $54.99 | $49.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 24.92 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 145 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | N / A |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||