NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 8 October 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1051 vs 830
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 253
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7525 vs 2902
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 10.872
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 304.279 vs 166.832
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 0.817
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 12.415
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 36.916
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1951
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3324
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1951
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3324
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1051 vs 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7525 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 vs 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 vs 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 1051 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 283 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 7525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 20.161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 304.279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 1.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 30.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 96.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 2179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 2179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R7 250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GF108 | Oland |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $89 |
Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1087 |
Price now | $54.99 | $78.34 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 27.62 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 716.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 22.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | N / A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |