NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon R7 M260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 vs 517
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 125
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.832 vs 145.3
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1404
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 vs 1093
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 1704
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1404
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 vs 1093
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 1704
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 vs 517 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 vs 145.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 vs 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 vs 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 1704 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5125 vs 2902
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.249 vs 10.872
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.925 vs 0.817
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.992 vs 12.415
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.895 vs 36.916
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 940 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5125 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 vs 36.916 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R7 M260 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 517 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 125 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 5125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 14.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 145.3 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 19.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 77.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 1704 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GF108 | Topaz |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 11 June 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $799 |
Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1479 |
Price now | $54.99 | $799 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 1.33 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 940 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 721.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 22.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,100 million |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 32 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |