NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus AMD Radeon R7 M260
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon R7 M260 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 versus 517
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 125
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.832 versus 145.3
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 1404
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 versus 1093
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 1704
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 1404
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 versus 1093
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 1704
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 versus 517 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 versus 145.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 versus 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 versus 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 1704 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M260
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 940 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 56% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 22.56 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 4% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 721.9 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5125 versus 2902
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.249 versus 10.872
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.925 versus 0.817
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.992 versus 12.415
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.895 versus 36.916
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 940 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.56 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 721.9 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5125 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 versus 36.916 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R7 M260 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 517 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 125 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 5125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 14.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 145.3 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 19.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 77.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 1704 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Topaz |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 11 June 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $799 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1479 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $799 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 1.33 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 940 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 721.9 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 22.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 3,100 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 32 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |