NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 51 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 vs 1631
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 1974
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 vs 1631
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 1974

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 700 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
• Around 6% better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1578 vs 830
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 253
• Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 vs 2902
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.332 vs 10.872
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 265.424 vs 166.832
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.093 vs 0.817
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.009 vs 12.415
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.219 vs 36.916
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2446 vs 1951
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2446 vs 1951

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	830 1578
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	253 385
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2902 4071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.872 14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.832 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.817 1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.415 15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.916 38.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1693 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3324 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1693 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3324 1974

Compare specifications (specs)