NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1088 vs 653
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 129
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 8.572
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 vs 151.304
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1524
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1524
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1088 vs 653 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 129 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 vs 8.572 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 vs 151.304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 vs 1524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 vs 1524 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3687 vs 3034
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 vs 0.642
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 vs 11.732
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 vs 16.3
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1426 vs 861
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 vs 1443
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1426 vs 861
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 vs 1443
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 vs 3034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 vs 0.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 vs 11.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 vs 16.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 vs 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 vs 1443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 vs 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 vs 1443 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1088 | 653 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 129 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3034 | 3687 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 | 8.572 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 | 151.304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 | 0.808 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 | 13.943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.3 | 39.301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 | 1524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 861 | 1426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1443 | 2519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 | 1524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 861 | 1426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1443 | 2519 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GK208 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1440 | 1443 |
| Price now | $79 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
| Boost clock speed | 889 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K1100M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400E
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M360
