NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 311.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3687 vs 2454
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 vs 6.498
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 151.304 vs 140.06
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 vs 0.502
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 vs 9.613
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 vs 12.49
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 vs 1151
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 vs 2073
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 vs 1151
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 vs 2073
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 15 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops vs 311.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 vs 2454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 vs 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 vs 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 vs 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 vs 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 vs 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 vs 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 vs 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 vs 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 vs 2073 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 676 vs 653
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 129
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1426
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1426
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 vs 653 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 vs 129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 vs 1426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 vs 1426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 653 | 676 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 | 2454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 | 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 | 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 | 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 | 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 | 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 | 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 | 2073 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GK208 | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1443 | 1445 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Price now | $99.21 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 889 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |