NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- Environ 42% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 441.6 gflops versus 311.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 97% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3687 versus 2454
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 versus 6.498
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 151.304 versus 140.06
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 versus 0.502
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 versus 9.613
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 versus 12.49
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 versus 1151
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 versus 2073
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 versus 1151
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 versus 2073
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 15 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops versus 311.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 versus 2454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 versus 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 versus 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 versus 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 versus 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 versus 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 versus 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 versus 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 versus 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 versus 2073 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 41% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.96 GTexel / s versus 9.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 676 versus 653
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 versus 129
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 versus 1426
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 versus 1426
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 575 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s versus 9.2 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 versus 653 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 versus 129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 versus 1426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 versus 1426 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 653 | 676 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 | 2454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 | 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 | 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 | 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 | 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 | 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 | 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 | 2073 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GK208 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1443 | 1445 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $99.21 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 889 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | 810 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 9.2 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |