NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 vs 902
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 274
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1790 vs 1688
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1790 vs 1688
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 May 2014 vs 8 October 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 vs 902 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 vs 274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 vs 290.632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 vs 1688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 vs 1688 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 4271
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 11.994
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 1.023
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 15.139
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 23.651
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1427
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2153
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1427
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2153
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5331 vs 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 vs 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 vs 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 vs 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 vs 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2153 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1469 | 902 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 274 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 | 5331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | 13.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | 290.632 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | 1.262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | 21.59 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | 60.326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | 1688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | 2342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | 1688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | 2342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | AMD Radeon R7 240 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Oland |
Launch date | 29 May 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | $69 |
Place in performance rating | 1270 | 1236 |
Price now | $94.99 | $49.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.87 | 24.92 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | N / A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |