NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 300.3x more memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 16 August 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3337 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 6.5x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 15.68 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 793
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 149
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 3866
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 9.392
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 157.479
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 vs 0.864
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 16.101
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.191 vs 44.77
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3285 vs 1589
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3235
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3285 vs 1589
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3235
- 4.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 vs 345
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 752.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4413 vs 793 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 vs 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15375 vs 3866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 vs 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 vs 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 vs 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 vs 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 vs 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 vs 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3235 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 vs 345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3866 | 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 16 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1301 | 701 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Price now | $321.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 915 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |