NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 5100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and NVIDIA NVS 5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

NVIDIA NVS 5100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 550 MHz
3.9x more texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
7.2x better floating-point performance: 833.3 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2747

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 November 2013 vs 7 January 2010
Core clock speed	1085 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate	34.72 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 48
Floating-point performance	833.3 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3335 vs 2747

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5100M

Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
46.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2747 vs 59.6

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2747 vs 59.6

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5100M

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3335

2747

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

59.6

2747

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	NVIDIA NVS 5100M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	393.811
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.793
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	19.139
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3011
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2916
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3335	2747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	51
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	47
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	59.6	2747
PassMark - G3D Mark		200
PassMark - G2D Mark		62
Geekbench - OpenCL		6549

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition	NVIDIA NVS 5100M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GK107	GT216
Launch date	8 November 2013	7 January 2010
Place in performance rating	1487	1490
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	1085 MHz	550 MHz
Floating-point performance	833.3 gflops	116.16 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	384	48
Texture fill rate	34.72 GTexel / s	8.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	486 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3