NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 5100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and NVIDIA NVS 5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 550 MHz
  • 3.9x more texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • 7.2x better floating-point performance: 833.3 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2747
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 November 2013 vs 7 January 2010
Core clock speed 1085 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate 34.72 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Floating-point performance 833.3 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3335 vs 2747

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5100M

  • Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 46.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2747 vs 59.6
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2747 vs 59.6

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5100M

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3335
2747
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
59.6
2747
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition NVIDIA NVS 5100M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 393.811
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.793
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.139
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3011
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2916
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3335 2747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 51
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 47
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 59.6 2747
PassMark - G3D Mark 188
PassMark - G2D Mark 63
Geekbench - OpenCL 6549

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition NVIDIA NVS 5100M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Tesla 2.0
Code name GK107 GT216
Launch date 8 November 2013 7 January 2010
Place in performance rating 1489 1492
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 1085 MHz 550 MHz
Floating-point performance 833.3 gflops 116.16 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 48
Texture fill rate 34.72 GTexel / s 8.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 486 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3