NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 2x more core clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 540 MHz
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
• 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
• 4.4x better floating-point performance: 833.3 gflops vs 187.49 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1580 MHz
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2502

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

• Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 42x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2502 vs 59.6

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	59.6 2502

Compare specifications (specs)