NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3696
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3696
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3333
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 May 2018 vs 2 August 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1518 MHz
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 7008 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 8368
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 8368
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1518 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 7008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 vs 8368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 vs 8368 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 | 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 | 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3333 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5088 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66999 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP107 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 21 May 2018 | 2 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 339 | 370 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 1417 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
| Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
IntelArc A370M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
