NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 980 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17478 vs 14380
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 41.336
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 4.121
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 156.419
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 27 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17478 vs 14380 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 vs 41.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 vs 4.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 vs 156.419 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 1,862 gflops
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5241 vs 5036
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 579 vs 461
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1351.496 vs 799.414
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.14 vs 30.523
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3685
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops vs 1,862 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5241 vs 5036 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 vs 461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 vs 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 vs 30.523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3685 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5036 | 5241 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | 579 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17478 | 14380 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 41.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 1351.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 4.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 58.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | 156.419 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1798 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 27 September 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 589 | 584 |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 915 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 640 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |