NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 776 MHz
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s
- 2.2x more pipelines: 640 vs 288
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 894.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 102 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 83% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 3828 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 2006
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 443
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1914
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1914
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 24 April 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 776 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 288 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops vs 894.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 102 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 3828 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 2006 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1914 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 | 2006 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | 443 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 1914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 1914 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | GF114 |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 24 April 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 586 | 587 |
| Price now | $124.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 776 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | 894.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 288 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 102 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 210 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 91.9 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3828 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
