NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon HD 6990
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and AMD Radeon HD 6990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 830 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4035 vs 3014
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 4562
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 4562
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 8 March 2011 |
Core clock speed | 999 MHz vs 830 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4035 vs 3014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 vs 4562 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 vs 4562 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6990
- 5.3x more texture fill rate: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 53.12 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 640
- 3x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 1,700 gflops
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 286
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1341
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1341
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 53.12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 1,700 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 1491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 1491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 6990 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4035 | 3014 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 532 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12601 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 | 4562 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1491 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1341 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 | 4562 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1491 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1341 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2076 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.264 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 840.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.76 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.903 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 265.302 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 6990 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | GP107 | Antilles |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 8 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 670 | 666 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1328 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 999 MHz | 830 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | 2x 2,549.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 2x 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,640 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 295 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |