NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 455
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro 455 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 53.12 GTexel / s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,700 gflops vs 1,313 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4020 vs 3113
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12601 vs 11003
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 4146
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 4146
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 30 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 999 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s vs 41.04 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops vs 1,313 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4020 vs 3113 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12601 vs 11003 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 vs 4146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 vs 4146 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 285
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1762 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1341
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1762 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1341
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1762 vs 1491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1762 vs 1491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 455
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro 455 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4020 | 3113 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 285 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12601 | 11003 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 | 4146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1491 | 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1341 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 | 4146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1491 | 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1341 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2076 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 573.646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.793 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.673 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Baffin |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 30 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 656 | 678 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1328 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 999 MHz | 855 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s | 41.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 81.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |