NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 455

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro 455 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 855 MHz
  • Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 53.12 GTexel / s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
  • Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,700 gflops vs 1,313 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4020 vs 3113
  • Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12601 vs 11003
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 4146
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 4146
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2018 vs 30 October 2016
Core clock speed 999 MHz vs 855 MHz
Texture fill rate 53.12 GTexel / s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 1,700 gflops vs 1,313 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4020 vs 3113
Geekbench - OpenCL 12601 vs 11003
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6614 vs 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6614 vs 4146

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455

  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 285
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1762 vs 1491
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1341
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1762 vs 1491
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1341
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 768 vs 640
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 vs 285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1762 vs 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 1341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1762 vs 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 1341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 455

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4020
3113
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
285
705
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
12601
11003
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6614
4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1491
1762
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1341
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6614
4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1491
1762
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1341
3359
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro 455
PassMark - G3D Mark 4020 3113
PassMark - G2D Mark 285 705
Geekbench - OpenCL 12601 11003
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6614 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1491 1762
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1341 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6614 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1491 1762
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1341 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 33.484
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 573.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.793
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 148.673

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro 455

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 4.0
Code name GP107 Baffin
Launch date 3 January 2018 30 October 2016
Place in performance rating 656 678
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1328 MHz
Core clock speed 999 MHz 855 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,700 gflops 1,313 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 640 768
Texture fill rate 53.12 GTexel / s 41.04 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 3,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size large large
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.1 GB / s 81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 5080 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0