NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs ATI FireMV 2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and ATI FireMV 2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 324 MHz
- 41x more texture fill rate: 53.12 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 17.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 392 MHz
- 112.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4049 vs 36
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 259
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 1 January 2006 |
Core clock speed | 999 MHz vs 324 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s vs 1.296 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 392 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4049 vs 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 vs 259 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2200
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | ATI FireMV 2200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4049 | 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 | 259 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12601 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1491 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1341 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1491 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1341 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2076 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | ATI FireMV 2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Rage 9 |
Code name | GP107 | RV370 |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 1 January 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 669 | 666 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1328 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 999 MHz | 324 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s | 1.296 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 3.136 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 392 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 |