NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1098 MHz
Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 53.12 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Around 21% better floating-point performance: 1,700 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4042 vs 3467
Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12690 vs 8148
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 4920
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 4920

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 January 2018 vs 3 December 2015
Boost clock speed	1328 MHz vs 1098 MHz
Texture fill rate	53.12 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,700 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4042 vs 3467
Geekbench - OpenCL	12690 vs 8148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6614 vs 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6614 vs 4920

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 999 MHz
Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 289
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1491
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1341
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1491
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1341

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 999 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	340 vs 289
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 1341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 1341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4042

3467

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

289

340

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12690

8148

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6614

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1491

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1341

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6614

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1491

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1341

3355

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	4042	3467
PassMark - G2D Mark	289	340
Geekbench - OpenCL	12690	8148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6614	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1491	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1341	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6614	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1491	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1341	3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		171.268

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP107	GM107
Launch date	3 January 2018	3 December 2015
Place in performance rating	700	701
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1328 MHz	1098 MHz
Core clock speed	999 MHz	1029 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,700 gflops	1,405 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	640
Texture fill rate	53.12 GTexel / s	43.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size	large	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB / s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus