NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon R9 M275

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R9 M275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
• Around 61% better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 1,184 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 vs 1115
• Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 9231
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 28.064
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 313.463
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 2.206
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 121.685
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 1162
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1717
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 1162
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1717

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275

• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 292
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.381 vs 30.523

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4463 1115
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	292 569
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17466 9231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.209 28.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	799.414 313.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.536 2.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.523 34.381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	223.683 121.685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 1717

Compare specifications (specs)