NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon HD 7750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 1693
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 427
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 21.658
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 566.052
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 2.182
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 98.126
- 27.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 305
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1439
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3295
- 27.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 305
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1439
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3295
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 15 February 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 819.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 vs 1693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 21.658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 vs 566.052 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 vs 2.182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 98.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 3295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 3295 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750
- 160.7x more memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 vs 24.676
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 vs 24.676 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | 1693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 427 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 21.658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 566.052 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 2.182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 37.143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 98.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3295 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 15 February 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | $109 |
Place in performance rating | 487 | 1128 |
Price now | $159.99 | $149.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | 14.41 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,500 million |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 1125 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |