NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs Intel HD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and Intel HD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• 4x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
• 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
• 4.8x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 1114
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 268
• 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 4554
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 27.948
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 312.246
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 1.795
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 20.404
• 9.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 32.567
• 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 1859
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1945
• 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 1859
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1945

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 388 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6332 1114
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	650 268
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 4554
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 27.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 312.246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 1.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 20.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 32.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 1859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1945
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 388

Compare specifications (specs)