NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 612 MHz
- Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 39.2 billion / sec
- 6x more pipelines: 768 vs 128
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 387.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 171 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 9.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 643
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 252
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 2 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 612 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 39.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 387.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 171 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 vs 643 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 252 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
- 154.3x more memory clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Memory clock speed | 1080 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | 643 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 252 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
Code name | GP107 | G80 |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 2 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | $829 |
Place in performance rating | 487 | 647 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 612 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | 612 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 387.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 39.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 171 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 681 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 270 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 103.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 1080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
SLI |