NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 148 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 109 billion / sec vs 66.82 GTexel / s
• 2.2x more pipelines: 1664 vs 768
• Around 83% better floating-point performance: 3,920 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 6332
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 650
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 vs 20732
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 vs 75.758
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 vs 843.503
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 vs 5.071
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 vs 24.676
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 vs 301.168
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 8496
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 8496
• Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 369 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6332 9640
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	650 766
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 28498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 8.737
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 490.688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 369

Compare specifications (specs)