NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD FirePro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

AMD FirePro M6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 800 MHz
2.1x more texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5324 vs 1820
2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19887 vs 8095
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 3024
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 vs 1832
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 3024
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 vs 1832

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 January 2018 vs 1 July 2012
Core clock speed	1152 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate	68.02 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Floating-point performance	2,177 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5324 vs 1820
Geekbench - OpenCL	19887 vs 8095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8059 vs 3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3579 vs 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8059 vs 3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3579 vs 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6000

Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 75 Watt
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 347

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	43 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	776 vs 347

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5324

1820

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

347

776

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

19887

8095

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8059

3024

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3579

1832

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8059

3024

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3579

1832

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3357

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	AMD FirePro M6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	5324	1820
PassMark - G2D Mark	347	776
Geekbench - OpenCL	19887	8095
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	54.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1159.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	82.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	293.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8059	3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3579	1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8059	3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3579	1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2219

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	AMD FirePro M6000
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Code name	GP107	Heathrow
Launch date	3 January 2018	1 July 2012
Place in performance rating	532	535
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1417 MHz
Core clock speed	1152 MHz	800 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,177 gflops	1,024 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	640
Texture fill rate	68.02 GTexel / s	32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	43 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	1,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		n / a
Form factor		MXM-B
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB / s	72 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready