NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 1046 MHz
• Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.188 vs 49.824
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 1089.67
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 4.899
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 44.06
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 103.884
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 7412
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3340
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 7412
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3340
• Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 vs 2138

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

• Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 134 billion / sec vs 68.02 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
• Around 53% better floating-point performance: 3,333 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5926 vs 5368
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 560 vs 355
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 vs 18143
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3579
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3579

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5368 5926
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 560
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	18143 18372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.188 49.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1159.046 1089.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.507 4.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.067 44.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.638 103.884
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2219 2138

Compare specifications (specs)