NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 4.2x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 1000
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 vs 1000 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 359 vs 323
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24076 vs 20732
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 vs 323 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24076 vs 20732 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | 1000 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 24076 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP106B | Oland |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 533 | 527 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 730 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |