NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon R9 370X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R9 370X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5600 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 65.071
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 8393
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 8393
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 27 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 65.071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 8393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 8393 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 2,488 gflops
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 vs 20734
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 vs 843.503
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 vs 5.071
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 24.676
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 301.168
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s vs 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 2,488 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 vs 20734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 vs 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 vs 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 vs 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 vs 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3336 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R9 370X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20734 | 25659 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 65.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1139.703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 5.39 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 88.44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 337.583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 8393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 8393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R9 370X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP106B | Trinidad |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 27 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 545 | 547 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 2,637 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 82.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 179.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
