NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GRID K280Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2x more core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 745 MHz
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 2840
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 6555
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1312
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 6555
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1312

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K280Q

• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 371 vs 323
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3562 vs 3336
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3562 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K280Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5919 2840
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 371
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 6555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1312
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 6555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1312
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3562

Compare specifications (specs)