NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1090 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
• 1130.9x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 4101
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20734 vs 17592
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 55
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.656
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 237.944
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 6821
• 73.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 115.4
• Around 35% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 1730

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)

• Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 323
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 vs 843.503
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 vs 24.676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5919 4101
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 577
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20734 17592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 970.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 4.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 76.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 237.944
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 6821
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 115.4
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 1730

Compare specifications (specs)