NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1090 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
• 1130.9x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 4102
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20102 vs 17646
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 55.048
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.655
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 239.111
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 6821
• 73.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 115.4
• Around 36% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2336 vs 1723

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)

• Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 323
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 969.655 vs 843.503
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.807 vs 24.676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5919 4102
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 574
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20102 17646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 969.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 4.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 76.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 239.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 6821
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 115.4
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2336 1723

Compare specifications (specs)