NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 1001.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- 6.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 369
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 19 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 148 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 vs 369 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 109 billion / sec vs 77.76 GTexel / s
- 2.2x more pipelines: 1664 vs 768
- Around 58% better floating-point performance: 3,920 gflops vs 2,488 gflops
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 5918
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 323
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 vs 20732
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 vs 75.758
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 vs 843.503
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 vs 5.071
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 vs 24.676
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 vs 301.168
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 8496
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 8496
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec vs 77.76 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops vs 2,488 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 vs 5918 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 323 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 vs 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 vs 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 vs 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 vs 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 vs 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3336 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | 9640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 28498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 105.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1225.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 8.737 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 35.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 490.688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 | 369 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP106B | GM204 |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 19 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 533 | 371 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Price now | $407.76 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 3,920 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1664 |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 109 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 148 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1664 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
G-SYNC support | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |