NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 97% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 148 Watt
- 1001.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- 6.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 versus 369
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 19 September 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 148 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 versus 369 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Environ 40% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 109 billion / sec versus 77.76 GTexel / s
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 1664 versus 768
- Environ 58% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,920 gflops versus 2,488 gflops
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 versus 5918
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 323
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 versus 20732
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 versus 75.758
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 versus 843.503
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 versus 5.071
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 versus 24.676
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 versus 301.168
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 8496
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 8496
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109 billion / sec versus 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1664 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops versus 2,488 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 versus 5918 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 323 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 versus 20732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 versus 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 versus 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 versus 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 versus 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 versus 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 | 369 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106B | GM204 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 19 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 533 | 371 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Prix maintenant | $407.76 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 3,920 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1664 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 109 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 4x | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pins | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V7300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V3300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
