NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 95% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 773 MHz
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 123.0 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 2,573 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 vs 6680
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 673
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32384 vs 18372
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 vs 65.548
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1325.07 vs 732.046
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 vs 5.453
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.946 vs 17.725
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 vs 217.357
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 6291
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 6291
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2016 vs 29 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 773 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 123.0 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 2,573 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 vs 6680 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 vs 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 vs 18372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 vs 65.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 vs 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 vs 5.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 vs 17.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 vs 217.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 vs 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 vs 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 vs 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 vs 3332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Around 44% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1152
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 4.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 680 vs 156
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 1152 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 vs 156 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 | 6680 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 | 18372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | 65.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | 5.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | 17.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | 217.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 156 | 680 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP106 | GM204 |
Launch date | 18 August 2016 | 29 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $791 |
Place in performance rating | 388 | 534 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $765.93 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 773 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | 2,573 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 1664 |
Texture fill rate | 123.0 GTexel / s | 80.39 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
SLI options | 1 | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |