NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB versus NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 95% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 773 MHz
- Environ 53% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 123.0 GTexel / s versus 80.39 GTexel / s
- Environ 53% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,935 gflops versus 2,573 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 versus 6680
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 versus 673
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32384 versus 18372
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 versus 65.548
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1325.07 versus 732.046
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 versus 5.453
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.946 versus 17.725
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 versus 217.357
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 versus 6291
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 versus 6291
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 versus 29 June 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 773 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.0 GTexel / s versus 80.39 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops versus 2,573 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 versus 6680 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 versus 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 versus 18372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 versus 65.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 versus 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 versus 5.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 versus 17.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 versus 217.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 versus 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 versus 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 versus 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 versus 3332 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Environ 44% de pipelines plus haut: 1664 versus 1152
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- 4.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 680 versus 156
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1664 versus 1152 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 versus 156 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 | 6680 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 | 18372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | 65.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | 5.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | 17.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | 217.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 156 | 680 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP106 | GM204 |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 | 29 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $791 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 388 | 534 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $765.93 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 773 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops | 2,573 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 1664 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.0 GTexel / s | 80.39 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 250 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |