NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R9 380
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 3,476 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 190 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 8.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 6152
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 vs 58.135
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 7635
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 7635
- Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3667 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 108.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 3,476 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 vs 6152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 vs 58.135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 7635 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 vs 2792 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 444
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 29491
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1503.633 vs 1371.266
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3654
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3654
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 vs 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 vs 29491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 vs 1371.266 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3654 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 | 6152 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 656 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29491 | 76397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | 58.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | 1503.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 | 2792 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP106B | Antigua |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 401 | 373 |
Price now | $229.99 | $264.99 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | 31.71 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | 970 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 3,476 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 108.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 190 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,000 million |
Compute units | 28 | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 182.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 970 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |