NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 72% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 875 MHz
- Environ 84% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 928 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 3 GB
- 1144x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 30868 versus 28119
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 versus 75.429
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 versus 6.854
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 versus 182.11
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 versus 10021
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3342
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 versus 10021
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3342
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3671 versus 3365
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 versus 7 November 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 875 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 928 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30868 versus 28119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 versus 75.429 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 versus 6.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 versus 182.11 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 versus 10021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 versus 10021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3671 versus 3365 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Environ 57% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 210 billion / sec versus 133.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 2880 versus 1280
- Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,345 gflops versus 4,275 gflops
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9528 versus 8161
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 633 versus 444
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 versus 1371.266
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.067 versus 19.803
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 3654
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 3654
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 210 billion / sec versus 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,345 gflops versus 4,275 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9528 versus 8161 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 633 versus 444 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 versus 1371.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.067 versus 19.803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3654 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 | 9528 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 633 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30868 | 28119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | 75.429 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | 2001.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | 6.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | 58.067 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | 182.11 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | 10021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | 10021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3671 | 3365 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP106B | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 | 7 November 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $237.11 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 406 | 407 |
| Prix maintenant | $229.99 | $749.99 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.49 | 14.80 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | 2880 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops | 5,345 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2880 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 133.6 GTexel / s | 210 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 336 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| Surround | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
AMDFirePro W8000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
AMDFirePro R5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M
