NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 705 MHz
- Environ 95% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 876 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 375 Watt
- 1144x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 30914 versus 22732
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 versus 66.419
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 versus 1261.593
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 versus 7.89
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.803 versus 17.882
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 versus 309.857
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 versus 8124
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 versus 2413
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 2226
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 versus 8124
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 versus 2413
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 2226
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 versus 28 May 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 705 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30914 versus 22732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 versus 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 versus 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 versus 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 versus 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 versus 309.857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 versus 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 versus 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 versus 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 versus 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 2226 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 338 billion / sec versus 133.6 GTexel / s
- 4.5x plus de pipelines: 2x 2880 versus 1280
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 5,046 gflops versus 4,275 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 versus 8161
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 639 versus 444
- 4.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 versus 3671
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 338 billion / sec versus 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 5,046 gflops versus 4,275 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 versus 8161 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 639 versus 444 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 versus 3671 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 | 8905 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 639 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30914 | 22732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | 309.857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 2226 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3671 | 17055 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP106B | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 | 28 May 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $237.11 | $2,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 406 | 404 |
| Prix maintenant | $229.99 | $1,580 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.49 | 6.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | 5760 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops | 2x 5,046 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2x 2880 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 133.6 GTexel / s | 338 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 672 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| Surround | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
AMDFirePro W8000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
AMDFirePro R5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M
