NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 875 MHz
• Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 928 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
• 1144x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.271 vs 75.429
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.754 vs 6.854
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.592 vs 58.067
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 416.14 vs 182.11
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 vs 10021
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3342
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 vs 10021
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3342

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

• Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 118.4 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
• Around 41% better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 3,789 gflops
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9517 vs 7901
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 415
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28211 vs 27871
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 vs 1681.162
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3340 vs 3316

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7901 9517
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	415 635
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	27871 28211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	147.271 75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1681.162 2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.754 6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	98.592 58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	416.14 182.11
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12767 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12767 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3342
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3340

Compare specifications (specs)