NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 202.0 GTexel / s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 6,463 gflops vs 5,914 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13507 vs 9443
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 851 vs 819
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 vs 114.288
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 vs 10.947
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 vs 683.568
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 11675
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 11675
- Around 43% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6066 vs 4242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 June 2016 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 202.0 GTexel / s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops vs 5,914 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13507 vs 9443 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 vs 819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 vs 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 vs 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 vs 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 11675 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 vs 4242 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Around 47% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 1920
- 131.3x more memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 vs 1718.593
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 vs 28.289
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 1920 |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 vs 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 vs 28.289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13507 | 9443 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 | 819 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44918 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | 2911.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | 118.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 | 4242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Grenada |
Launch date | 10 June 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | $429 |
Place in performance rating | 278 | 279 |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | 5,914 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1920 | 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 202.0 GTexel / s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 6,200 million |
Compute units | 44 | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Width | 2-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |