NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 60% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 9% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 202.0 GTexel / s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 9% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,463 gflops versus 5,914 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 275 Watt
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13509 versus 9437
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 851 versus 820
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 versus 114.288
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 versus 10.947
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 versus 683.568
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 versus 11675
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 versus 11675
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6065 versus 4242
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2016 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 202.0 GTexel / s versus 184.8 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops versus 5,914 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 275 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13509 versus 9437 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 versus 820 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 versus 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 versus 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 versus 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 versus 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 versus 11675 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6065 versus 4242 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Environ 47% de pipelines plus haut: 2816 versus 1920
- 131.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 versus 1718.593
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 versus 28.289
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2816 versus 1920 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 8 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 versus 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 versus 28.289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3340 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13509 | 9437 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 | 820 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44903 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | 2911.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | 118.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6065 | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP104 | Grenada |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $379 | $429 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 279 | 280 |
Prix maintenant | $359.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops | 5,914 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1920 | 2816 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 202.0 GTexel / s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 6,200 million |
Unités de Compute | 44 | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 275 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB / s | 384 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 512 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8 GB/s | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |