NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) versus AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 Fury pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 68% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13509 versus 9592
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 851 versus 796
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 versus 140.274
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 versus 10116
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 versus 10116
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6065 versus 4739
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2016 versus 10 July 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13509 versus 9592 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 versus 796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 versus 140.274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 versus 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 versus 10116 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6065 versus 4739 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Environ 11% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 224.0 GTexel / s versus 202.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 87% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 1920
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 7,168 gflops versus 6,463 gflops
- 62.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 500 MHz versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53646 versus 44903
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3595.432 versus 1718.593
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.082 versus 12.283
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 132.701 versus 28.289
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 789.536 versus 710.366
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3691
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.0 GTexel / s versus 202.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 versus 1920 |
| Performance á point flottant | 7,168 gflops versus 6,463 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 500 MHz versus 8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53646 versus 44903 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 versus 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 versus 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 versus 28.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 versus 710.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3340 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13509 | 9592 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 | 796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 44903 | 53646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | 140.274 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | 3595.432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | 13.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | 132.701 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | 789.536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6065 | 4739 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | GP104 | Fiji |
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2016 | 10 July 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $379 | $549 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 279 | 278 |
| Prix maintenant | $359.99 | $399.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.72 | 35.98 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops | 7,168 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 3584 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 202.0 GTexel / s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 56 | |
| Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 2-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 4096 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8 GB/s | 500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
