NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1138 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 210 Watt
• 5.1x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1572 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14687 vs 12354
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 828
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 182.11 vs 153.117
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1797.792 vs 1722.138
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 vs 11.901
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 12822
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 12822

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 302.4 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
• Around 47% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2432
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 9,677 gflops vs 8,186 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62260 vs 51569
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 126.528 vs 26.444
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1172.788 vs 1035.984
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3638
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3638

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14687 12354
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	876 828
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	51569 62260
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	182.11 153.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1797.792 1722.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.071 11.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.444 126.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1035.984 1172.788
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 12822
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3353

Compare specifications (specs)