NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon RX Vega

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 225 Watt
• 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14695 vs 12297
• 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 2094
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3638 vs 2391
• 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 2094
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3638 vs 2391

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega

• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 307.2 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
• Around 68% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2432
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 9,830 gflops vs 8,186 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 876
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68096 vs 55390
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.048 vs 182.11
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3986.188 vs 1797.792
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.999 vs 14.071
• 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.468 vs 26.444
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1291.445 vs 1035.984
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3344
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14695 12297
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	876 882
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55390 68096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	182.11 205.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1797.792 3986.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.071 17.999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.444 215.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1035.984 1291.445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 8455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 8455

Compare specifications (specs)