NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14687 vs 12297
- 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 2094
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3638 vs 2391
- 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 2094
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3638 vs 2391
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 November 2017 vs 1 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14687 vs 12297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 vs 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 vs 2391 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 307.2 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- Around 68% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2432
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 9,830 gflops vs 8,186 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 876
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67658 vs 51569
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.049 vs 182.11
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4007.96 vs 1797.792
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.022 vs 14.071
- 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.8 vs 26.444
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1292.989 vs 1035.984
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3344
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3344
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 307.2 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2432 |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops vs 8,186 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 vs 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67658 vs 51569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.049 vs 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4007.96 vs 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.022 vs 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.8 vs 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1292.989 vs 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 vs 3344 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14687 | 12297 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 | 882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51569 | 67658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | 205.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | 4007.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | 18.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | 215.8 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | 1292.989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 8455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.3 |
Code name | GP104 | Greenland |
Launch date | 2 November 2017 | 1 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $599.99 |
Place in performance rating | 235 | 238 |
Price now | $379.99 | $409.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | 38.94 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | 9,830 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2432 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 255.8 GTexel / s | 307.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |